Obama Bashing Brigade

 

Obama Bashing Brigade@webworldismyoyster.com new

Submitted by Sid H. (May. 4, 2011) on June 13, 2012 – 8:17pm.
  1. इदं न मम – I take no credit for this

    mysistereileen.com/

    Obama Bashing Brigade@webworldismyoyster.com new. Submitted by Sid H. (May. 4, 2011) इदं न मम – Barack Obama’s Press Leaks, Oops, Release and I

  2. इदं न ममObama Bashing Brigade

    mysistereileen.com/?p=3580

    54 minutes ago – 3 days ago – 5 days ago – Obama’s Pacific Century Balloon « इदं न मम – My Sister Eileen. … a water of President, Barack Obama’s foreign

  3. इदं न मम – Of Slavery, Emancipation and I

    mysistereileen.com/?p=2056

    Apr 16, 2012 – Romney Pens Open Letter to Obama – Washington Wire – WSJ … Mitt Romney’s Pacific, Oops, Atlantic Victory LapTop « इदं न मम …. is at its center, the marching men of his regiment are strong and resolute, each an individual. …. Syndrome and I · OBAMA BASHING IN BOGOTA · Of Foreign Wars, US

  4. इदं न मम – Fucking With China

    mysistereileen.com/?p=2330

    May 3, 2012 – China Bashing According to Robert Naiman « Hindutva US Policy – cogito ergo sum. News …. Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize: Sid Harth – Page 55 – .soc.culture.china … 1 hour ago – “I think it was with 3rd Brigade, 1st ID, 1-26. When they came …. My dear Robert Naiman, I am Sid Harth « इदं न मम

  5. इदं न मम – I take no credit for this – My Sister Eileen

    mysistereileen.com/?p=lbzcznytjwenztuc&paged=254

    Apr 16, 2012 – Romney Pens Open Letter to Obama – Washington Wire – WSJ … Mitt Romney’s Pacific, Oops, Atlantic Victory LapTop « इदं न मम …. is at its center, the marching men of his regiment are strong and resolute, each an individual. …. Syndrome and I · OBAMA BASHING IN BOGOTA · Of Foreign Wars, US

  6. इदं न मम – 1.1 بِسْمِ اللّهِ الرَّحْمـَنِ الرَّحِيم 1:2 الْحَمْدُ للّهِ رَبِّ الْعَالَمِين 1:3

    mysistereileen.com/?p=lbzcznytjwenztuc&paged=247

    Apr 16, 2012 – Romney Pens Open Letter to Obama – Washington Wire – WSJ … Mitt Romney’s Pacific, Oops, Atlantic Victory LapTop « इदं न मम …. is at its center, the marching men of his regiment are strong and resolute, each an individual. …. Syndrome and I · OBAMA BASHING IN BOGOTA · Of Foreign Wars, US

  7. इदं न मम – I take no credit for this – My Sister Eileen

    mysistereileen.com/?p=cfefnibpsierd&paged=212

    May 3, 2012 – China Bashing According to Robert Naiman « Hindutva US Policy – cogito ergo sum. News …. Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize: Sid Harth – Page 55 – .soc.culture.china … 1 hour ago – “I think it was with 3rd Brigade, 1st ID, 1-26. When they came …. My dear Robert Naiman, I am Sid Harth « इदं न मम

  8. इदं न मम – I take no credit for this

    mysistereileen.com/?pag_&paged=243

    May 3, 2012 – China Bashing According to Robert Naiman « Hindutva US Policy – cogito ergo sum. News …. Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize: Sid Harth – Page 55 – .soc.culture.china … 1 hour ago – “I think it was with 3rd Brigade, 1st ID, 1-26. When they came …. My dear Robert Naiman, I am Sid Harth « इदं न मम

  9. इदं न मम – I take no credit for this

    mysistereileen.com/?FORM=Z9FD1&paged=241

    May 3, 2012 – China Bashing According to Robert Naiman « Hindutva US Policy – cogito ergo sum. News …. Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize: Sid Harth – Page 55 – .soc.culture.china … 1 hour ago – “I think it was with 3rd Brigade, 1st ID, 1-26. When they came …. My dear Robert Naiman, I am Sid Harth « इदं न मम

  10. इदं न मम – I take no credit for this – My Sister Eileen

    mysistereileen.com/?cat=qgriudjmsxluptg&paged=207

    May 3, 2012 – China Bashing According to Robert Naiman « Hindutva US Policy – cogito ergo sum. News …. Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize: Sid Harth – Page 55 – .soc.culture.china … 1 hour ago – “I think it was with 3rd Brigade, 1st ID, 1-26. When they came …. My dear Robert Naiman, I am Sid Harth « इदं न मम

Ads related to Obama Bashing Brigade इदं न ममWhy these ads?

  1. Official Obama Website

    www.barackobama.com/

    We’re moving the country forward, not backward. Join the movement.

  2. Obama Sucks

    www.cafepress.com/173 seller reviews

    Buy ObamaSucks Gifts! Lots of Designs, Fast Shipping

  3. Free Anti Obama Stickers

    www.patriotsunite.us/

    Lets Make Some Change in Nov. 2012 Bumper Stickers,License Plates,Etc.

It is much too easy to write a book than lead a nation. Unfortunately, I cannot both write a book, much less, read a book.

If as the author of this review of the book, “Bending History: Barack Obama’s Foreign Policy” Eugenio Lilli, ever wrote a book, I doubt, led a nation, I sincerely doubt, I would recommend him to be the next leader of men.

…and I am Sid Harth@webworldismyoyster.com

  1. इदं न मम – Barack Obama’s Press Leaks, Oops, Release and I

    mysistereileen.com/?p=3503

    Barack Obama’s Press Leaks, Oops, Release and I. Published on June 11, 2012 by admin इदं न मम – NPR, I am Sid Harth – My Sister Eileen SiDevilIam, Oops, Foreign Policy and I « इदं न मम – My Sister Eileen … …. Hi, NPR! …and I

  2. इदं न मम – My Dear David Rothkopf, I am Barack Obama.

    mysistereileen.com/?p=3525

    1 day ago – Foreign Policy: 5 Ideas To Save Obama’s Presidency. by David Rothkopf. President Barack Obama waves as he speaks on the economy at

  3. इदं न मम – Oh-Man, Middle East Muddle, Oops, Puddle and I

    mysistereileen.com/?p=3482

    2 days ago – Monroe …. Bending History: Barack Obama’s Foreign Policy – इदं न मम … US (Fucked-up) Foreign Policy and I « My Sister Eileen

  4. इदं न मम – I take no credit for this

    mysistereileen.com/

    Welcome to Foreign Policy’s new commenting system! …. A battle is brewing over President Barack Obama’s pick to be the next U.S. ambassador to Iraq, with

  5. हिन्दू तर्क शास्त्रद्न्य सिद्धार्थ – Get Down and

    mysistermarilynmonroe.org/

    1 day ago – Jun 3, 2012 – Ad related to @mysistereileen.com Bashar al-Assad Barack … … US (Fucked-up) Foreign Policy and I « My Sister Marilyn Monroe …

  6. वसुधैव कुटुंबकम – My Dear Gennady Yevstafiev, I am Sid Harth.

    www.webworldismyoyster.com/…/my-dear-gennady-yevstafiev-i-am…

    3 days ago – 5 days ago – Obama’s Pacific Century Balloon « इदं न मम – My Sister Eileen. … a water of President, Barack Obama’s foreign policy in

  7. वसुधैव कुटुंबकम – My Dear Thomas E Ricks, I am Sid Harth.

    www.webworldismyoyster.com/…/my-dear-thomas-e-ricks-i-am-sid-…

    3 days ago – Dog ate my funny comment, Oops, Barack’s cyber warriors chewed by brain stem. US (Fucked-up) Foreign Policy and I « My Sister Eileen

  8. Think before You Look, Adam Garfinkle – My Sister Marilyn Monroe

    mysistermarilynmonroe.org/…/think-before-you-look-adam-garfinkl…

    May 28, 2012 – 5 days ago – 2 days ago – US (Fucked-up) Foreign Policy and I « My Sister Eileen. …. Afghanistan AfPak War Al Qaeda Barack Obama BJP BP

  9. हिन्दू तर्क शास्त्रद्न्य सिद्धार्थ – Oh-Man v Mitt

    mysistermarilynmonroe.org/…/oh-man-v-mitt-man-round-and-round…

    May 27, 2012 – Ads related to इदं न मम Barack Obama Mitt Romney foreign … A Foreign Policy Perspective of Mitt Romney’s 2012 Bid for the … Apr 11, 2012 – US (Fucked-up) Foreign Policy and I « इदं न मम – My Sister Eileen

  10. इदं न मम – I take no credit for this

    www.cogitoergosumdesign.com/?m=notcwwoyvrvuagyl&paged…

    Jun 2, 2012 – Slider My Sister Eileen, Oops, Kim Barnes and I · Slider Jordan vs Slider My Dear John McCain, I am Barack Obama. Slider Oops, There Goes They, both stuck in the mud, of foreign policy sewer. Never felt better. Ask me

Ad related to @mysistereileen.com Romney foreign policyWhy this ad?

  1. Mitt Romney for President | MittRomney.com

    www.mittromney.com/

    This election is about restoring American greatness. Donate Today.

HomeDiscussions › Scoring Obama’s Foreign PolicyUser Comments on

Scoring Obama’s Foreign Policy

Summary:The Obama administration’s foreign policy has tried to reconcile the president’s lofty vision with his innate realism and political caution. And given the domestic and global situations Obama has faced, pragmatism has dominated. Judged by the standard of protecting U.S. interests, things have worked out quite well; judged by the standard of midwifing a new global order, they remain a work in progress.

Comments

Obama Bashing Brigade@webworldismyoyster.com new

Submitted by Sid H. (May. 4, 2011) on June 13, 2012 – 8:17pm.

It is much too easy to write a book than lead a nation. Unfortunately, I cannot both write a book, much less, read a book.

If as the author of this review of the book, “Bending History: Barack Obama’s Foreign Policy” Eugenio Lilli, ever wrote a book, I doubt, led a nation, I sincerely doubt, I would recommend him to be the next leader of men.

…and I am Sid Harth@webworldismyoyster.com

“President Barack Obama is

Submitted by . (Nov. 14, 2011) on May 11, 2012 – 2:00pm.

“President Barack Obama is running on a platform of ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan while demonstrating toughness against al Qaeda”
It is sad that the right-wing groups in the US continue over-the-top campaigns against Obama that help cover times when serious issues arise- people are fed up with the ‘hate and racism’ and won’t hold this administration accountable for its actions (skin color not a factor.)
I fail to understand how anyone could say Obama is ‘tough on Al-Qaida’- true, he authorized the killing of Bin Ladin, and allows about a drone strike once every four days in Pakistan, or where ever we feel like droning- but he also handed Libya and much of the Middle East to Al-Qaida and other hateful Islamists… We will be seeing the effects of such take overs for decades to come.
What part of Article 2 (4) does Obama not understand? we have no right to interfere in the internal politics of other countries, regardless of Al-Jazeera media campaigns. It is also against US law to murder leaders of other countries (even if they are as obnoxious as Qathafi, and even through proxies- we don’t like other countries using proxies to commit acts of violence, why is it OK when we do it.?)
The massive instability that the Obama administration has created with extremely arrogant and short sighted foreign policies in the world is leading to World War III, or at least a large area of ‘ungoverned’ spaces, where Al-Qaida and other fanatics can flourish (Yemen, Egypt, Syria, Libya, Tunisia, etc.) I guess the policy is to help hatful Islamists (not to be confused with average Muslims in any way) to take over countries, then when insurgencies arise, we go in and drone them as they are now a ‘threat,’ and we can do anything we feel like, as sovereignty is thing of the past.
I wonder how the US would feel if the Iranian or Syrian ambassador visited the OWS camps, promising the demonstrators weapons, air strikes, political support and sanctions against our country as they are ‘poor persecuted things’ and of course, must be right, if they are screaming at the cameras…
It would have been much wiser to find a way to assist in lowering food the cost of food, ask for political change (vs. demanding such change) and slowly assist in increasing stability of countries struck by the Arabs Spring- not using US tax dollars to assist rebels who clearly affiliated themselves with Al-Qaida take over a country with vast oil reserves.
I continue to be puzzled about our drone campaign, what exactly is the difference between a suicide bomber blowing up civilians hoping to hit their target and a US drone blowing up civilians hoping to hit its target (to the people on the ground, not much)- it is important “when fighting monsters to not become one yourself..” but I guess ‘the Golden Rule’ only applies to some people.
I dont recall a time where the United States was at a greater risk of being the victim of retaliation for its foreign policy than today, we already got hit for once for the same reason- ‘successful foreign policy’ this is not. It is difficult to see the difference between the current administration and the previous one- but justify “predatory democracy” in the words of John Mearsheimer “Bush and Obama are more Wilsonian than Wilson himself”

Grosso Modo President Obama

Submitted by Omar N. (Mar. 20, 2009) on May 3, 2012 – 1:29pm.

Grosso Modo President Obama has spectacularly failed in two major domains
1-Image/Promise versus actual performance
2-Reradiness to bend over and “forget all about it.”

Contrary to the widely held expectation of a socially and economically relatively more progressive President President Obama at the time of real test ( 1907/8 economic crisis) not only failed to exploit a historical opening for a real structural “New Deal 2″ for the USA by reforming the basics of America’s business based economy but opted instead aided and abetted by a substantially Bush Jr. team to alleviate the symptoms of the crisis in a manner to ensure back to “business as usual” as quickly as possible.
His treatment by actually salvaging and rewarding the powers that were behind the crisis ( Mega Corporations and affiliates) while penalizing pension funds and labor unions etc laid at rest all expectations of a more progressive and less conservative presidency that took him to the White House despite all odds in the first place .

His ”forget all about it” modus operandi when faced with actual or potential hard opposition was best displayed and in evidence with his two presumably courageous Middle East initiatives:
a-His famous ”Cairo” University speech which promised a great deal (in words more eloquent than usual but no less insubstantial) that turned out to be nothing more than a banal new write up of standard Middle East USA policies of the last four decades: all bluster and NO action as expected by Arab both public and official circles
and
b-His initiative about a “total freeze” of ALL Israeli Settlements construction activities in 1967 occupied Palestinian territories; an initiative that was not only born dead and quickly buried but was hastily withdrawn with unusual and truly unseemly haste for a presumably major power .
All talk about a new global order will evaporate with the first real global crisis; that is or are bound to happen in a second possible term.
The man seems to me to be both spineless and insubstantial once All image ( but now much besmirched)and no mettle!
Should President Obama be reelected the honor will go to a more unconvincing rival; period!

ON A SCALE OF 1 >100 obama is 30 below zero

Submitted by ray j. (Jan. 15, 2012) on April 26, 2012 – 5:25pm.

FOLKS , the truth is I pray for this man and his office , that the LORD GUIDS IN WISDOM

but i can truly say that i have stoped , due to many reasons but mostly due to the fact the burden of prayer is not there nor was it ever, i have prayed for many leaders and some of recent years , i have stoped because i feel very strongly not to continue , because he is not in step with the best interest of us .

i know that this is not factor in this forum that presents many concerning topics.
but i also will not hesitate to state that , bush junior and cheney were a disaster also.

that fact is we are facing the economic hardship because of failed policies of the last decade on both sides of the fence .

folks this foreign policy future is the defence of our freedom. and i will say we have no right nor support for going half way around the globe and telling others how to live at the point of a nato gun.

now with that said , obama has failed on many levels , but he does have advisors , so he is not totally to blame. i can point digs at obama leaning into russia in south korea and asking putin for a favour while putin is supporting and aiding in the slaughter of syrians.
things like this screw up is made known for many reasons, but first and foremost it is to make us aware to be focused on caution in stead of being sheep .
the american people are far from sheep and they have paid the price of obama’s foreign policy on many levels including live and limb.

obama is a humanitarian , but in no way is he wise in foreign policy , and his history of failures is a record to this fact.

obama is a humanitarian Talk

Submitted by . (Nov. 14, 2011) on May 11, 2012 – 2:02pm.

obama is a humanitarian
Talk to the families of those we droned “hoping” to kill a bad guy, or those civilians in Libya that were subjected to 7000 air missions to allow Al-Qaida to take over the country…..

Post new comment

Sid H. (May. 4, 2011)

Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can’t read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated.
Save
Preview
GP Columns
Your comment has been queued for moderation by site administrators and will be published after approval.

Review: Bending History: Barack Obama’s Foreign Policy by Martin S. Indyk et al

Eugenio Lilli – 30th May 2012

Bending History: Barack Obama’s Foreign Policy by Martin S. Indyk, Kenneth G. Lieberthal and Michael E. O’Hanlon. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2012. 200 pp., £18.99 hardcover, 978 0815721826

The United States is quickly moving toward a new presidential election at the end of this year. Bending History, by the authors’ own admission, is an effort to provide the American public with an informed evaluation of President Obama’s foreign policy performance. Martin Indyk, Kenneth Lieberthal, and Michael O’Hanlon hold distinguished positions at the Brookings Institution, one of America’s oldest and most renowned think tanks. At the time of this writing, none of them has been a member of the Obama’s team, although they all have had the opportunity to advise the administration on some aspects of its foreign policy. Given the experience and expertise of the authors, and the timing of the publication, at the outset of another electoral campaign, this book is certainly a must-read.

Bending History’s main thesis is that Barack Obama is an hybrid president or as the book puts it: “a progressive pragmatist.” According to the authors, “Obama’s foreign policy has repeatedly manifested a combination of the realist’s pragmatic approach to the world as it is and the idealist’s progressive approach to a new world order that he seeks to shape.” During the first three years of his mandate President Obama’s original vision of bending the arc of history toward justice, peace, and stability has had to come to terms with the reality of the world as it is: complex, sometimes seemingly intractable, and partisan. Therefore, “Obama has proven to be progressive where possible but pragmatic when necessary.” However, Indyk, Lieberthal, and O’Hanlon argue that by setting very ambitious goals for his administration and then following more cautious and incremental foreign policies, Obama has laid himself open to criticism.

Bending History provides a point-by-point assessment of the main issues of the United States’ foreign policy: US relations with an emerging China; the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and the wider effort against international terrorism; the difficulties of the Arab-Israeli peace process; the revolts that swept across the Arab world between 2011 and 2012; nuclear proliferation in Iran and North Korea; and finally the issues of energy policy, climate change, and weak states, aka the “soft security” agenda. In addition, in the last chapter the authors also discuss the existence of a specific Obama doctrine in foreign policy and explain some policy proposals to maintain the United States competitive in the future. In particular, they save no energy in reminding us the importance for any future US president of putting the American economy back on its feet as the first and indispensable step in order to achieve any other successive goal.

The book gives an overall balanced assessment of the 44th president of the United States’ foreign policy record, as it singles out both the accomplishments, such as the killing of Osama bin Laden and other prominent members of al-Qaeda, and the failures, for example the lack of improvements in the Middle East peace process. When faced with less clear-cut issues, however, the authors have a tendency to take the side of the administration, as in the case of its inability to reach an agreement with Iraq to keep some US troops in the country, and in achieving substantial progress in controlling Iran and North Korea’s nuclear programs. Considering US strategic interests in Yemen, above all in terms of fighting international terrorism and proximity to Saudi Arabia, it is surprising that an analysis of the country is absent in the chapter on the Arab Awakenings, and only a quick reference is made to it in the one on War, Counterterrorism, and Homeland Protection. Despite these minor issues, Bending History represents a detailed, well-researched, and up-to-date book indispensable for understanding and evaluating the foreign policy performance of President Barack Obama during his first three years in office.

Eugenio Lilli is currently a Postgraduate Researcher at the Defence Studies Department, King’s College London, and a Teaching Fellow at the UK Joint Services Command and Staff College. His research interests include terrorism and US foreign policy, particularly United States’ relations with the Muslim world.

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
reCAPTCHA challenge image

Get a new challenge
Get an audio challenge
Help

 

We use cookies to support features like login and allow trusted media partners to analyse aggregated site usage. Keep cookies enabled to enjoy the full site experience. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review our cookies information for more details.

American foreign policy

Please don’t go

A handful of books convey a mix of optimism and fear

Mar 24th 2012 | from the print edition

 

The World America Made. By Robert Kagan. Knopf; 149 pages; $21. Random House; £14.99. Buy from Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk

Strategic Vision: America and the Crisis of Global Power. By Zbigniew Brzezinski. Basic Books; 208 pages; $26 and £17.99. Buy from Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk

No One’s World: The West, the Rising Rest, and the Coming Global Turn. By Charles Kupchan. Oxford University Press USA; 272 pages; $27.95. To be published in Britain in May; £16.99. Buy from Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk

Bending History: Barack Obama’s Foreign Policy. By Martin Indyk, Kenneth Lieberthal and Michael O’Hanlon. Brookings Institution Press; 342 pages; $29.95 and £18.99. Buy from Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk

Obama and China’s Rise: An Insider’s Account of America’s Asia Strategy. By Jeffrey Bader. Brookings Institution Press; 172 pages; $26.95. To be published in Britain in April; £18.99. Buy from Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk

AMERICA is irrepressible. Even authors fixated on its decline are optimists in disguise. Times may be hard and the world order is changing, but America has what it takes to bounce back, according to five new books on foreign policy. Indeed, it has to bounce back, because no successor stands ready to shoulder these responsibilities.

In “The World America Made” Robert Kagan, a prominent neoconservative, argues that the liberal order America created after the second world war may not endure if America loses the power or will to defend it. As hegemons go, America has been exceptional. Democracy has spread under its watch, and its geographical isolation has made the world surprisingly accepting of its use of force. No combination of nations has felt the need to join together to counter America’s power, leaving it free to perform vital tasks in the common good, such as keeping open trading routes.

To those who believe that a multipolar world could be at least as peaceful as the one dominated by America, Mr Kagan says history proves otherwise. Rules rarely outlast the powers that created them. Nations go to war when they are “in doubt about which is stronger,” he writes. The world is more stable when one nation dominates, especially when it is a nation like America.

It is therefore fortunate, Mr Kagan concludes, that most talk about America’s decline is overblown. The country has passed through such moods before, during the trauma of Vietnam in the 1970s, for example, and then again in the 1980s during Japan’s breakneck ascent as an industrial power. And yet it bounced back. Although past success does not guarantee future triumph, the American system, with its relative freedom, is uniquely capable of recovering and adapting. The danger will come only if Americans believe they can put their global responsibilities on hold while they set their own house in order.

Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter’s national security adviser, is equally certain that a vigorous and powerful America is indispensable. But he shows more doubt in his new book, “Strategic Vision”. He contends that America must wrestle down its own debt, steady its financial system, reduce inequality, rebuild its infrastructure and fix its gridlocked politics. Abroad, it must promote and guarantee an expanded West (embracing Russia and Turkey) and balance the great powers of Asia.

Like Mr Kagan, Mr Brzezinski does not believe America’s decline is foreordained. Its economy is still relatively vast, its population wealthy and young, its businesses and universities innovative. But if decline is not inevitable, nor is resurgence. He states that America is in danger of sliding into “systemic obsolescence”, caused by political stalemate at home and misguided engagement abroad in “lonely and draining campaigns” against sometimes “self-generated” enemies, such as Iraq.

If American leadership does collapse, what then? Like Mr Kagan, Mr Brzezinski argues that no single power is ready to supplant it. He foresees instead a protracted period of chaotic realignments. China may be ambitious and proud, but it is still in the throes of modernisation; it knows that its continued rise depends for now on the present order. A nationalist and militaristic China would swiftly isolate itself as anxious neighbours allied against it.

For now it seems the alternative to a world dominated by America is “No One’s World”, the title of Charles Kupchan’s book. A professor of international relations and a veteran of the Clinton White House, he is the gloomiest of these authors. For the first time in history, he says, the world will have no global guardian. Western policymakers are deluded to think that they can use their twilight of pre-eminence to lock rising powers into their own values and institutions.

It is going to be much harder than that, Mr Kupchan says. The spread of liberal ideas has been driven less by their intrinsic appeal than by the material dominance of Western countries. Democracy might still advance, but not fast enough to match the great rebalancing of power now under way. And even if the rising powers do come to share the West’s values, they will clash over status and prestige, because they feel that this is their turn for a place in the sun. The West “will have to give as much as it gets as it seeks to fashion a new international order that includes the rest”.

For example, the West will need to stop preaching that only liberal democracies are to be considered legitimate governments: “responsible governance” should be enough to put a state in good international standing. To his mind, America’s “overzealous” promotion of democracy in Bosnia, Iraq and Afghanistan did more harm than good. The West must now show greater respect for the sovereignty of other nations and treat China with “a nuanced mix of engagement and containment”.

Grand theories of foreign policy are entertaining. The actual work of it is far messier, as shown in “Bending History”, a close review of President Barack Obama’s first term by three scholars at the Brookings Institution. They find that for all his inspiring speeches, the president’s performance has at best been workmanlike. In fact the lofty speeches are a problem: they have often seemed detached from actual policy, raising expectations he cannot fulfil.

The Brookings authors conclude that much of Mr Obama’s agenda remains incomplete. Killing Osama bin Laden and decimating al-Qaeda were successes, but the outcome in Afghanistan and relations with Pakistan hang in the balance. Though “resetting” relations with Russia made possible the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty and paved the way for tighter sanctions on Iran, Russia’s mercurial politics could always throw such progress into reverse. The “pivot” to Asia in November 2011 was “appropriate”, but leaves future relations with a rising China unresolved.

The abject failure of the first term was in Palestine. As these scholars see it, Mr Obama’s determination to ignore Israeli public opinion while cultivating the Arab street doomed his diplomacy. In the Arab spring he balanced “prudent” support for the tide of democracy against a realistic regard for American interests. Even so, the net result is that the pillars of America’s position in the region—its strategic alliances with Egypt and Saudi Arabia, and the virtuous triangle between Israel, Egypt and Turkey—are shaking.

If America cannot bend the Middle East to its will, what of China? In “Obama and China’s Rise” Jeffrey Bader, one of the architects of Mr Obama’s China strategy until leaving the White House in 2011, explains in a brisk insider’s narrative just how tricky it can be to concoct the “nuanced mix” of engagement and containment that Mr Kupchan advocates. But in the end Mr Bader is one of the optimists. America prevailed over Germany, Japan and the Soviet Union, which had imperial ambitions. China, he asserts, does not—not yet, at any rate.

Maybe. But America’s clashes with these powers came when its own economy was growing. How will it fare if it is truly in decline? Ultimately, these authors agree, America’s power abroad stands on its health at home. If its economy cannot be restored, and America really is indispensable, then the whole world is in serious trouble.

from the print edition | Books and arts

Advertisement

GET FASTER ANSWERS TO
YOUR BIG DATA QUESTIONS
with Jim Goodnight, co-founder and CEO of SAS
SAS High-Performance Analytics on
Answer questions as fast as you can think them up. http://t.co/a7M2DyTF #SAShpa #bigdata
Answer questions as fast as you can think them up. http://t.co/R7wYWyuN #SAShpa #bigdata
Answer questions as fast as you can think them up. http://t.co/spjfBnla #SAShpa #bigdata
Answer questions as fast as you can think them up. http://t.co/Abr27AtH #SAShpa #bigdata
Are you analytically-driven or analytically challenged? #sashpa http://t.co/iMZLBDIS
SAS High-Performance #Analytics Tames Your #BigData Challenge: http://t.co/mAWgo1k8 via @youtube #SAShpa
It’s really about being nimble, says @vcotte about #bigdata hype. Check it out on the #BA Knowledge Exchange #sasHPA http://t.co/Gfum7wFN
Big data hype and value http://t.co/CxkGkmaC #sashpa #sasap
Big data hype and value http://t.co/E8M2RcdE #sashpa #sasap
RT @gracypoelman: Infographic showing major industries “before” and “after” High-Performance Analytics #sashpa http://t.co/QcoV3Tys
RT @gracypoelman: Infographic showing major industries “before” and “after” High-Performance Analytics #sashpa http://t.co/QcoV3Tys
Infographic showing major industries “before” and “after” High-Performance Analytics #sashpa http://t.co/QcoV3Tys
Infographic showing major industries “before” and “after” High-Performance Analytics #sashpa http://t.co/k3U7fySS
After your #SASGov crash course in SAS High-Performance Analytics, here are ideas for getting started http://t.co/lfEgyifP #sashpa #bigdata
RT @SASanalytics: David Pope shares “The Next Big Thing: High-Performance #Analytics” at #SASGov conf #SAShpa http://t.co/rIm6JhfX http://t.co/7KUPGDQH
RT @SASanalytics: David Pope shares “The Next Big Thing: High-Performance #Analytics” at #SASGov conf #SAShpa http://t.co/rIm6JhfX http://t.co/7KUPGDQH
David Pope shares “The Next Big Thing: High-Performance #Analytics” at #SASGov conf #SAShpa http://t.co/rIm6JhfX http://t.co/7KUPGDQH
Want more? http://t.co/cVeEHOWP #sashpa (slide via @jilldyche) RT @deb_orton http://t.co/PIHLJrY5 characteristics of Big Data #sasgov
SAS author @cjdinger on High-performance analytics: it may be a show, but it’s not an act http://t.co/dqrYVY3d #SASHPA #bigdata
Cool orchestrated video. SAS High-Performance Analytics Tames Your Big Data Challenge: http://t.co/DduSP0xy #bigdata #SAShpa

Follow SAS HPA

Article from The Economist

Welcome to the yotta world
Big Data will flood the planet
Nov 17th 2011 | from The World in 2012 print edition

Products & events
Get e-mail newslettersSubscribe to The Economist’s free e-mail newsletters and alerts.
Follow The Economist on TwitterSubscribe to The Economist’s latest article postings on Twitter
Follow The Economist on FacebookSee a selection of The Economist’s articles, events, topical videos and debates on Facebook.
Sid Harth

An Assessment of Barack Obama’s Foreign Policy

Loading…
582 views

Published on Mar 15, 2012 by

On March 12, the Brookings Institution hosted the launch of “Bending History” featuring a discussion of President Obama’s foreign policy and defense strategies. More on this event: http://is.gd/CTuzC8

  • 5 likes, 0 dislikes

see all

All Comments (2)

Add a channel now to post a comment!
  • no mentioning of russia at all?

    mathhero79 2 months ago

  • Thank you very much!

    arex1338 2 months ago

Rajab 22, 1433
Thursday 14th June 2012 |

Obama’s foreign policy
From the Newspaper | | 12th March, 2012
7

HOW has Barack Obama done as US president so far? Clearly many Pakistanis have a less than positive view — though interestingly, Pakistani expectations for Obama were never as high as in much of the rest of the world.

But as we begin a presidential campaign in the US, and debate the future of the US-Pakistan relationship in both countries, it is perhaps a good moment to consider the question anew.

A new book on Obama’s foreign policy by Martin Indyk, Ken Lieberthal, and myself attempts to contribute constructively to this debate. It is entitled Bending History: Barack Obama’s Foreign Policy after the famous Martin Luther King quote that Obama uses so much — to the effect that history’s arc is long but that it also bends in the direction of justice.

This title conjures up the high hopes Obama conveyed to the world back in the heady days of 2007 and 2008 and early 2009, and surely held himself at some level, about what his presidency could accomplish.

However, on the big subjects where Obama had transformative aspirations — repairing relations with the Islamic world, moving towards a nuclear-weapons-free planet, restructuring the architecture and membership of institutions like the UN, reducing global poverty, mitigating climate change — his efforts have been largely frustrated.

He has not fundamentally failed, in the sense that these intractable issues have been around a long time and will remain around for him and his successors to go after again. And on some, he’s made modest progress. But on balance, for these matters, the grade has to be incomplete at best.

On Pakistan, Obama truly tried a bigger and bolder approach. He tried hard to support Pakistan’s new civilian government, to show seriousness in regard to Afghanistan (attempting to mitigate Pakistani fears of another premature US withdrawal from the region), to increase aid, to intensify the personal diplomacy among top government leaders.

Yet 2011, including the raid on Abbottabad and the November tragedy near the Afghan-Pakistan border, show that on balance this has been a frustrating endeavour for leaders and publics in both countries.

More generally, a fuller review of this president’s overall track record, as we attempt in the book, leads to the conclusion that he has been a pragmatic, disciplined, and moderately successful president on many core matters of war and peace, and on the crucial subject of preventing a global economic meltdown during his first year in office as well.

Specifically: as seen in the nation’s wars, in Iraq and Afghanistan and against Al Qaeda globally, Obama has been strong, pragmatic, and non-ideological — not an apologist for the country, not weak and not naïve as many Republicans assert in the
American political debate.

Obama also toughened his initial approach toward the rogue states of Iran and North Korea. After offering to reach out his hand should they unclench their own fists, in his inaugural address, by the summer of 2009 he had concluded in both cases that such efforts were pointless and pivoted to much tougher approaches.

Having tried and failed to improve relations, he was well positioned to convince other countries to tighten sanctions thereafter — arguably becoming more effective than George W. Bush in pursuing much of the core Bush agenda. Of course, sanctions are not an end in themselves, and Obama has not been any more successful than previous presidents in rolling back either the North Korean or Iranian nuclear programmes.

He has done best on the major foreign policy problems: beyond Al Qaeda and the rogue states, also ‘Russia reset’ policy, progress towards a realistic and balanced partnership with China, further improvement in relations and India (building on the work of Clinton and Bush), and relations with most major allies. His nuclear nonproliferation record and defence records are good so far as well.

President Obama been generally prudent with the Arab awakenings including in Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain and Libya — not because he wished to ‘lead from behind’ but because he sought to work with coalitions and let others step up where American vital interests were less engaged or where US influence was inherently limited. Clearly, Syria remains a work in progress.

There have been major mistakes beyond those noted above, most notably in his handling of the Arab-Israeli peace process. His efforts to lead on climate change via adoption of cap-and-trade legislation at home failed abjectly. While his Afghanistan policy was well thought through, execution has been marred by inconsistent approaches by members of the Obama team — and this has been noticed in Pakistan too, we realise.

Although the financial crisis of 2008-09 was managed competently, the American economy is still in such a perilous place that repairing it has become the top priority for the president. Importantly, the US cannot sustain a role of global leader without shoring up its economic foundations. The world still very much wonders if it can accomplish that. On matters such as deficit reduction, Obama has not yet been successful. Relatedly, partisan acrimony has not been mitigated on his watch as he had hoped either.

Overall, this is a better foreign policy record than most presidents have attained at their three-year marks. Generally speaking, it represents the triumph of pragmatism over ideology and reflects a reluctant realism that this president has come to personify in office.

Still, one senses that it is not what Obama expected exactly out of his time in office, and that it leaves him feeling unsatisfied in many ways. Because of the enduring economic crisis, it also leaves the country weaker in some ways, though the cause here has hardly been entirely Obama’s doing.

Clearly, economic recovery will be crucial in the months and years ahead, for whoever is president. So will repairing the relationship with Pakistan. As frustrated as Americans as well as Pakistanis are with the partnership, on balance we need each other — and have enough common interests and sensibilities that repair should be feasible.

The writer is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, Washington D.C.

Share this:

Like this:

Be the first to like this.
anarchism in world . to impose the war against helpless people on the name of prosperity in Afghanistan Iraq Libya, and Syria. it is the great justice of leadership of america . 2000 people were killed in the bench mark event of 9/11. now we see more than one million people have been killed in this decade. pity to say still Nobel peace price award given to american president . the best nation is called to it. even they love humanity but hate human…
dear war is too serious business should not be left alone on leader(president). and we are not Iraq or Afghanistan. that he would avert the ways of war to Pakistan. he knows the history of Pakistani people. while being ally of Pakistan he drones, he invades even he attacks on our soldiers. dear we are the victims of war . its your war we helped and supported you… because we want peace and cooperation in the world.
0

Mustafa's avatarMustafa · 9 weeks ago

Obama is one of the best Presidents of America. If George Bush was President of America, possibly, he could have declared war against Pakistan after finding out that Osama Bin Laden was sheltering in Pakistan for over 6 years. President Obama remained an ally of Pakistan even he may be aware that Pakistani leaders cannot cooperate fully with America in war on terror due to fear of the Taliban, Al-Qaida, the Jihadis, the militants and the terrorists and their sympathizers.
0

oshkosh's avataroshkosh · 9 weeks ago

he is doing an excellent job.
Age dosent need to be only criteria..he is just not sincere and a stoog of American jews lobbyst in there power of holding world recources and showing their military might.he is just working on their agenda right from the day one in office..poor b**trd. will soon burn in hell the way he killed our innocent ppl trough drones

1 reply · active 7 weeks ago

0

abdul's avatarabdul · 9 weeks ago

noamerican president can survive without the support of jewish lobby
0

A.Vetta's avatarA.Vetta · 9 weeks ago

The relatively new problem in western democracies is that young and inexperienced individuals are elected to the highest office, occasionally, on the basis of their rhetoric. They learn ‘on the job’ and invariably make a mess of a few things. President Obama is no exception. Perhaps, there shuld be a minimum age requirement for holding the highest office in democracies.
Your comment must be approved by the site admins before it will appear publicly.

Post a new comment

Displayed next to your comments.
Not displayed publicly.
If you have a website, link to it here.

POLL

Do you see the case against Dr Arsalan Iftikhar as a campaign to malign the chief justice?
Copyright © 2012 DAWN.COM

…and I am Sid Harth@webworldismyoyster.com

Print Friendly
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>